Sustainable Development in Teaching: Examining Puzzle-Based Instruction, Professional Success, and the Role of AI-Driven Education
Article Sidebar
Critical thinking,
ELT teachers,
Puzzle-based instruction
Main Article Content
Mehdi Manoochehrzadeh
Abstract
Background: Recent scholarship emphasizes critical pedagogy and learner-centered approaches as cornerstones of sustainable ELT, aligning with UNESCO’s Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) goals. One promising pedagogical framework is Puzzle-Based Instruction (PBI), which engages learners through problem-solving, discovery, and critical thinking
Aims: This study investigates the interplay between puzzle-based instruction (PBI), teachers’ professional success, and the integration of AI-driven educational tools as a catalyst for sustainable development in English language teaching (ELT). Specifically, it examines the prevalence and application of PBI principles among Iranian English language teachers (IELTs) in high schools and universities, alongside the extent to which learner-centered approaches are adopted in classroom practice.
Methods: A stratified random sampling method was used to select 35 IELTs from diverse EFL contexts in Iran. Data were collected using two validated instruments: The inquiry-led puzzle teaching review (comprising five subsections and nine scenarios) and the Successful Iranian EFL Teacher Questionnaire (SIETQ), which encompasses 12 professional competence factors.
Result: The study found a significant link between knowledge of PBI and professional success, with BA- and MA-level teachers showing lower awareness and engagement with socio-political content. It highlights the need for targeted professional development to improve PBI competence and critical thinking. Additionally, the research underscores the transformative potential of AI-driven education, like adaptive learning systems and automated feedback tools, to enhance reflective practice and support personalized instruction.
Conclusion: Implications are offered for policymakers, curriculum designers, and teacher educators seeking to integrate both critical pedagogical and technological dimensions into ELT.
Article Details
Copyright (c) 2025 Mehdi Manoochehrzadeh
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Alibakhshi, G. (2012). On the Consequences of the Violation of Critical Pedagogy Principles from Iranian EFL Teacher Trainers ’ Perspectives. Iranian Journal of Applied Language Studies, 5(2), 1–28. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22111/ijals.2015.1875
Atai, M. R., & Mazlum, F. (2012). English language teaching curriculum in Iran : planning and practice. Curriculum Journal, 24(3), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2012.744327
Atkinson, D. (1987). The mother tongue in the classroom: A neglected resource? ETL Journal, 41(4), 59–68. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/41.4.241
Barjesteh, H. (2017). Navigating the Hindrances Arising at Macro and Micro-level from Practicality of Transformative Pedagogy. The Journal of English Language Pedagogy and Practice (10)20, 29-49.
Barjesteh, H., & Isaee, H. (2024). Research in English Is Technology an Asset ? Enhancing EFL Learners ’ Vocabulary. International Journal of Research in English Education, 9(1), 50–69. https://doi.org/https://ijreeonline.com/browse.php?a_id=848&sid=1&slc_lang=fa
Bartlett, B. S., & Burton, D. (2007). Introduction to education studies. Sage Publications Ltd. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=pkDK5eug1SoC&hl=id&source=gbs_citations_module_r&cad=2
Beydogan, O. (2002). Changes in Teaching Strategies and the Changing Role of Teachers. Çağdaş Eğitim, 27 (287), 34-39.
Canagarajah, S. (2005). ‘Critical pedagogy in L2 learning and teaching’ in E. Hinkel (ed.). Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410612700-69
Cohen, L., Manion, L. & Morrison, K. (2000). Research methods in education, (5th ed.), London: Routledge-Falmer, Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203224342
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203771587
Cook, V. (2001). Using the First Language in the Classroom. Canadian Modern Language Review, 57(3). 402-423. http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.57.3.402.
Crawford, L.M. (1978). Paulo Freire’s philosophy: Derivation of curricular principles and their application to second design. Unpublished doctorial dissertation, University of Minnesota. https://books.google.co.id/books/about/Paulo_Freire_s_Philosophy.html?id=7lrRy3soIEYC&redir_esc=y
Creswell, J. W. & Clark, V. L. P. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications. https://books.google.co.id/books/about/Designing_and_Conducting_Mixed_Methods_R.html?hl=id&id=eTwmDwAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y
Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2023). Artificial intelligence in higher education: The State of the field. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, 22. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1186/ s41239- 023- 00392- 8
Dellar, H. (2012). The great Dogme debate. [Web Log Message]. Retrieved from http://hughdellar.wordpress.com/category/the-great-dogme-debate-2.
Ford, K. (2009). Principles and Practices of L1/L2 Use in the Japanese University EFL Classroom. JALT Journal, 31(1), 63-80. https://doi.org/10.37546/JALTJJ31.1-3
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York, NY: Continuum. https://books.google.co.id/books/about/Pedagogy_of_the_Oppressed.html?hl=id&id=oKQMBAAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y
Freire, P. (2005). Teachers as cultural workers. Boulder, CO: West view Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429496974
Giroux, H. (1980). Critical theory and rationality in citizenship education. Curriculum Inquiry, 10 (4), 329-366. https://doi.org/10.1080/03626784.1980.11075229
Giroux, H. (1992). Border crossings: Cultural workers and the politics of education. New York: Rutledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203956502
Giroux, H. A. (1994). Disturbing Pleasures: Learning Popular Culture. New York: Routledge. https://books.google.co.id/books/about/Disturbing_Pleasures.html?id=Bw40JUFfjxcC&redir_esc=y
Godwin-Jones, R. (2020). Artificial intelligence in language learning: New roles for teachers? Language Learning & Technology, 24(3), 5–18.
Gore, J. M. (2003). What we can do for! What can “We” do for “You”? Struggling over empowerment in critical and feminist pedagogy. In A. Darder, M. Baltodano and R. D. Torres (Eds.), Critical pedagogy reader. New York: Routledge, Falmer.4(3). Google Scholar
Hall, J. K. (1). (Re) creating our worlds with words: A socio-historical perspective of face-to-face interaction. Applied Linguistics, 16(2), 206-232. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/16.2.206
Isaee, H., & Barjesteh, H. (2023). EFL teachers’ professional development needs: A comparative phenomenological analysis for face-to-face and online instruction. Journal of Studies in Learning and Teaching English, 12(2), 45-56. Google Scholar
Isaee, H., & Barjesteh, H. (2025). Screening EFL teachers’ and learners’ perceptions of emergency remote teaching during COVID-19 pandemic: A comparative analysis. Hu Arenas 8, 568–599. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42087-023-00353-7
Isaee, H., Barjesteh, H., & Rad, N. F. (2024). Integrating Brain-Based Learning Activities into Online TESOL Courses: Exploring Different Learning Styles. Journal of New Trends in English Language Learning (JNTELL), 3. https://doi.org/10.71528/2024.06221123351
Kessler, G., & Hubbard, P. (2017). Language Teacher Education and Technology. The Handbook of Technology and Second Language Teaching and Learning, 278–292. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118914069
Kincheloe, J.L. (2008). Knowledge and Critical Pedagogy: An Introduction. Springer Science & Business Media B.V. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=GZm4H8HjAz4C
Kumaravadivelu, B. (2003). Critical language pedagogy: A post method perspective on English language teaching. World Englishes, 22 (4), 539-550. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971X.2003.00317.x
Manoocherzadeh, M., Isaee, H., & Barjesteh, H. (2025). Artificial Intelligence in Project-Based Learning: A Systematic Review of Its Role in English Language Acquisition and Pedagogical Innovation. Indonesian Journal of Pedagogy and Teacher Education, 3(3), 81-91. https://doi.org/10.58723/ijopate.v3i3.502
McLaren, P. (1989). Life in School: An Introduction to CP in the foundation of education. New York: Longman Publishers USA. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1741-5446.1990.00267.X
Meddings, L., & Thornbury, S. (2009). Teaching unplugged: Dogme in English language teaching. Peaslake: Delta Publishing. https://books.google.co.id/books/about/Teaching_Unplugged.html?id=zoxQDwAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y
Mozafari, A., & Barjesteh, H. (2016). Enhancing literary competence through critical oriented reading strategies. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 5(7), 168-177. http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.5n.7p.168
Pennycook, A. (1990). Critical pedagogy and second language education. System, 18(3), 303–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/0346-251X(90)90003-N
Pennycook, A. (2001). Critical applied linguistics: A critical introduction. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410600790
Pishghadam, R., & Mirzaee, A. (2008). English Language Teaching in Postmodern Era. Journal of Teaching English Language and Literature, 7(2), 89-110. Google Scholar
Risdianto, E., Shirzadi, S., Rad, N. F., Barjesteh, H., & Isaee, H. (2025). Advancing English Language Education through Artificial Intelligence: A Review of Benefits and Challenges. Journal of New Trends in English Language Learning (JNTELL), 4(Special Issue). https://doi.org/10.57647/JNTELL.2025.si-01
Safari, P., & Pourshamsi, M. R. (2012). Toward an empowered pedagogy: Is there room for critical pedagogy in educational system of Iran? Theory and Practice in Language Study, 2(12), 2548-2555. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.2.12.2548-2555
Santana-Williamson, E. (2000). Critical Pedagogy in TESOL: A Review of the Literature. Retrieved from http://ericfac.piccard.csc.com/reprod.htmED447700
Shor, I. (1992). Empowering education: Critical teaching for social change. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press. https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/E/bo4034411.html
Shor, I. (1996). When students have power: Negotiating authority in a critical pedagogy. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/W/bo3631380.html
Sweet, S. (1998). Practicing radical pedagogy: Balancing ideals with institutional constraints. Teaching Sociology, 26, 100-111. https://doi.org/10.2307/1319278
Tang, J. (2002). Using L1 in the English classroom. English Teaching Forum, 40(1), 36-43. https://americanenglish.state.gov/files/ae/resource_files/02-40-1-h.pdf
Thornbury, S. (2000). A dogma for EFL. IATEFL Issues, 153, 2–4. https://nebula.wsimg.com/5663ba0b760132a894433eb2c1faec95?AccessKeyId=186A535D1BA4FC995A73&disposition=0&alloworigin=1
Thornbury, S. (2002). Don't mention the war! Taboo topics and the Alternative Textbook. Retrieved from http://www.thornburyscott.com/tu/taboo%20topics.htm.
Thornbury, S. (2011). Here’s a thought: Dogme research papers. [Yahoo Discussion Board Comment]. Retrieved from http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dogme/message/16697
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=u2PP6b0ddtoC&printsec=copyright&hl=id#v=onepage&q&f=false
Wells, G. (1999). Using L1 to master L2: A response to Anton and DiCamilla's "Socio-cognitive functions of L1 collaborative interaction in the L2 classroom." The Modern Language Journal, 83(2), 248-254. https://doi.org/10.1111/0026-7902.00019