The Impact of Digital Tools on Students’ Learning Outcomes: A Systematic Literature Review
Article Sidebar
Abstract:
Background of Study: Digital tools have been quickly adopted in the education field and the research on TEL has increased accordingly. Evidence on the effectiveness of digital tools in enhancing student learning outcomes, however, is still inconclusive and fragmented.
Aims and Scope of Paper: The purpose of this paper is to provide a systematic review of recent empirical research in the field of the effects of digital tools on student learning outcomes in higher education. This review highlights the major research themes, summarizes the research results, and suggests future research trends of peer-reviewed studies published during the period 2019–2025.
Methods: A systematic literature review was done according to PRISMA 2020. The corpus consists of 35 peer-reviewed studies from Scopus- and Association of Business Schools (ABS)-listed journals, out of 60 references. Selected studies were analyzed thematically, with a view to finding patterns and trends in the research on technology-enhanced learning.
Results: Thematic clusters were identified in the review, which included: (1) learning management systems (LMS) and academic performance; (2) mobile learning and gamification technologies; (3) artificial intelligence and adaptive learning systems; and (4) collaborative digital platforms and higher-order thinking. In general, digital tools had a positive impact on students' learning outcomes, but this impact was always moderated by various factors, such as pedagogical design, teacher digital competence, student digital literacy, and the quality of the infrastructure.
Conclusion: The Digital Tool – Learning Outcome Contingency Framework (DTLOCF) is proposed, and an eight-gap research agenda is presented for further research. The results suggest that digital tools are only effective for improving learning outcomes when they are used in conjunction with an effective instructional design, competent teachers, technologically literate students, and equitable technological infrastructure. The review offers recommendations for schools, school leaders and policymakers that will help them to reap the maximum benefit from digital technologies in education.
Keywords: Artificial Intelligence, Digital Tools, Higher Education, Student Learning, Technology-Enhanced Learning
Copyright (c) 2026 Hasan Ahmad, Dr Md Anwar Hossain, S M Abu Nayem Sarker
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Adedoyin, O. B., & Soykan, E. (2020). Covid-19 pandemic and online learning: The challenges and opportunities. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(2), 863–875. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1813180
Al-Fraihat, D., Joy, M., Masa’deh, R., & Sinclair, J. (2020). Evaluating e-learning systems success: An empirical study. Computers in Human Behavior, 102, 67–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.004
Alhawiti, M. M. (2022). The relationship between e-learning systems usage and learning outcomes: Examining the role of digital equity. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v17i01.27387
Almaiah, M. A., Al-Khasawneh, A., & Althunibat, A. (2020). Exploring the critical challenges and factors influencing the e-learning system usage during COVID-19 pandemic. Education and Information Technologies, 25, 5261–5280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10260-z
Alqahtani, A. Y., & Rajkhan, A. A. (2020). E-learning critical success factors during the COVID-19 pandemic: A comprehensive analysis of e-learning managerial perspectives. Education Sciences, 10(9), 216. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10090216
Basilaia, G., & Kvavadze, D. (2020). Transition to online education in schools during a SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic in Georgia. Pedagogical Research, 5(4), em0060. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/7937
Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university (4th ed.). Open University Press.
Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: Handbook I: Cognitive domain. David McKay.
Bond, M., Marín, V. I., Dolch, C., Bedenlier, S., & Zawacki-Richter, O. (2020). Digital transformation in German higher education: Student and teacher perceptions and usage of digital media. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17, 31. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00198-0
Bao, W. (2020). COVID-19 and online teaching in higher education: A case study of Peking University. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(2), 113–115. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.191
Cheng, G., Chau, J., & Tse, T. (2020). Students’ acceptance of cloud-based e-learning technology in EFL classrooms: A cross-cultural study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(6), 2242–2260. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12938
Chiu, T. K. F. (2022). Applying the self-determination theory (SDT) to explain student engagement in online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 54(S1), S14–S30. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2021.1891998
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Crompton, H. (2013). A historical overview of mobile learning: Toward learner-centered education. In Z. L. Berge & L. Y. Muilenburg (Eds.), Handbook of mobile learning (pp. 3–14). Routledge.
Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2023). Artificial intelligence in higher education: The state of the field. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00392-8
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Plenum Press.
Deci, E. L., Olafsen, A. H., & Ryan, R. M. (2020). Self-determination theory in work organizations: The state of a science. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4, 19–43. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113108
Dicheva, D., Irwin, K., & Dichev, C. (2020). OneUp Learning: A course gamification platform. Issues and Trends in Educational Technology, 8(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.2458/azu_itet_v8i1_dicheva
Guo, P., Saab, N., Post, L. S., & Admiraal, W. (2021). A review of project-based learning in higher education: Student outcomes and measures. International Journal of Educational Research, 102, 101586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101586
Hew, K. F., Jia, C., Gonda, D. E., & Bai, S. (2020). Transitioning to the “new normal” of learning in unpredictable times: Pedagogical practices and learning performance in fully online flipped classrooms. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17, 57. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00234-x
Hew, K. F., & Lo, C. K. (2020). Flipped classroom improves student learning in health professions education: A meta-analysis. BMC Medical Education, 18(1), 38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1144-z
Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. EDUCAUSE Review, 27. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning
HolonIQ. (2021). Global EdTech market size and forecast 2021–2027. HolonIQ Intelligence Report. https://www.holoniq.com/edtech/10-charts-that-explain-the-global-education-technology-market
Hong, Q. N., Pluye, P., Fabregues, S., Bartlett, G., Boardman, F., Cargo, M., & Vedel, I. (2018). Mixed methods appraisal tool (MMAT) version 2018. Canadian Intellectual Property Office.
Jeong, H., Hmelo-Silver, C. E., & Jo, K. (2019). Ten years of computer-supported collaborative learning: A meta-analysis of CSCL in STEM education during 2005–2014. Educational Research Review, 28, 100284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.100284
Jonassen, D. H. (1994). Technology as cognitive tools: Learners as designers. ITforum.
Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., & Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
Lai, J. W. M., & Bower, M. (2019). How is the use of technology in education evaluated? A systematic review. Computers & Education, 133, 27–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.01.010
Lim, J., & Richardson, J. C. (2021). Predictive effects of undergraduate students’ perceptions of social, cognitive, and teaching presence on affective learning outcomes according to disciplines. Computers & Education, 160, 104063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104063
Mahdi, H. S. (2019). The effectiveness of mobile learning for learning English: A meta-analysis. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(5), 2546–2562. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12740
Makransky, G., & Lilleholt, L. (2018). A structural equation modeling investigation of the emotional value of immersive virtual reality in education. Educational Technology Research and Development, 66(5), 1141–1164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9581-2
Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Mpungose, C. B. (2020). Emergent transition from face-to-face to online learning in a South African university in the context of the coronavirus pandemic. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 7, 113. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-00603-x
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Peng, X., Hong, E., & Zhang, L. (2019). Gamification in educational settings: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(6), 1529–1553. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09683-6
Piaget, J. (1972). The psychology of the child. Basic Books.
Radianti, J., Majchrzak, T. A., Fromm, J., & Wohlgenannt, I. (2020). A systematic review of immersive virtual reality applications for higher education: Design elements, lessons learned, and research agenda. Computers & Education, 147, 103778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103778
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Press.
Selwyn, N. (2022). Education and technology: Key issues and debates (3rd ed.). Bloomsbury Academic.
Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. (2019). Cognitive architecture and instructional design: 20 years later. Educational Psychology Review, 31(2), 261–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09465-5
Tlili, A., Shehata, B., Adarkwah, M. A., Bozkurt, A., Hickey, D. T., Huang, R., & Burgos, D. (2023). What if the devil is my guardian angel: ChatGPT as a case study of using AI in education. Smart Learning Environments, 10, 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00237-x
Turnbull, D., Chugh, R., & Luck, J. (2021). Learning management systems: A review of the research methodology literature in Australia and China. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 44(2), 164–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2020.1737002
Van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2020). The digital divide. Polity Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Wang, A. I., & Tahir, R. (2020). The effect of using Kahoot! for learning: A literature review. Computers & Education, 149, 103818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103818
Yildiz Durak, H. (2021). Flipped learning readiness in teaching programming in middle schools: Modelling its relation to various variables. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(1), 191–208. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12478
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marin, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education: Where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16, 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
Zhang, K., & Aslan, A. B. (2021). AI technologies for education: Recent research & future directions. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100025
Zhu, X., & Liu, J. (2020). Education in and after COVID-19: Immediate responses and long-term visions. Postdigital Science and Education, 2(3), 695–699. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00126-3